When writing a paper, there are many helpful steps to accomplish. One is selecting a topic; another is putting your thoughts down on paper. Each time you think of something to put in the paper, you are drafting the paper. One of the many definitions of “drafting” is “writing a first version to be filled out and polished later”. That is exactly what you have to do. When you draft a paper, you are expanding on your thoughts, outlining what you want to say with the paper. You are trying to fill all the requirements for the paper, while trying to tell a story. If you are drafting a paper, you are writing several versions of a paper, each draft being better than the first.
You would not, for example, just turn in a major paper with only your first thoughts as the completed paper. You make the paper better by finishing what you began to say, by filling in details. When you write an essay in class, like the response essays, you are writing without having all the details about what you could write. You are writing it without drafting because you have only one chance to write your thoughts. You don’t have the option of coming back to finish what you say. A paper is going to be left hanging or unfinished if it is written without the writer having the chance to complete the drafting process. This is why completed papers have the potential of greatness; the drafting process allows you to say something, and have it be exactly what needs to be said.
--Simmons
Writing should be done as a process. It takes time and working through -- Kave |
5 comments:
I especially like the point about how writing based on time limits is not a good reflection of a writer's capability.
Unfortunately, most major tests in America are based around one's ability to write for 3-4 hours on end. Everything from the GED to the ACT/SAT and the GRE require this skill, and most people aren't able to naturally write for that long. What does that say about our cultural understanding of what "talent" really is, I wonder?
I definantly agree with the fact that writing a well written paper is a process. And personal and peer review is a big step in the process. Sometimes you just don't know how to put your thoughts into words and others can help you with that. Also, after writing and reading it over and over you find new ways wording something or a detail you were missing out on. AFter getting feedback it makes it a lot easier. So i definantly don't think a well written paper is just done with one trial.
-Stephanie Learn
I also agree that a well written paper is a process. I am terrible at writing a paper during a time limit. I never do well on timed writings, however, I do great on papers that we are given time to draft, peer revise, conference with a teacher, and then turn in. This is a prime example that writing based on time limits is not a good reflection of exactly how good of a writer a person truly is. I am the type of writer that cannot be rushed to write a paper. I need to take my time and collect all of my thoughts on the subject I am writing about.
--Andrew
The drafting process is very beneficial. Having others review your paper is a key in the drafting process. Alowwing others to comment on your writitng before finalizing it aloows you the writer to add other persceptives and detail to your paper. I found peer review to be very helpful and successful for me. Im very greatful to have been able to take part in the peer reviews.
- Yearsley
I agree that writing is a process. It takes time and effort to complete a well written paper.I think it is very important to write down the topics you want to touch on and any other ideas you may have. This really helps when you have no idea where to begin. Rushing gets you know where. If you sit down and actually think for a while, you come up with very interesting points to consider.
--Gilmore--
Post a Comment